This week and next week I'll be looking at the Eastern and Western Conferences and evaluating the future of each team. This focuses specifically on players that the current teams have and looking at the contracts those players have signed. Each team has 8 forwards, 4 defenseman, and 1 goalie as part of their ranking with the belief that the other players on the team should not as a whole make much of an impact on the salary cap. Teams are evaluated based on numerous criteria including length's of contract, affordability of contract, whether players are playing out of position (ex. 2nd liners playing on the first line), amount of money wasted on bought out players, length of time players are controlled by RFA status. Essentially the more players that a team has locked up who are afforable or exceptional, the better there ranking. This is not necessarily a reflection of the performance of a team but on the potential for these teams to be healthy long term and have future success.
Part 1: Eastern Conference (The Top Half)1. Pittsburgh: The fact that Crosby and Malkin are locked up for 4 and 5 more years and both at affordable contracts for what they can produce is a definite factor. Their defence is strong, and if Gonchar and Whitney weren't injured might be one of the best in the league both now and for the next few years. They also aren't overpaying for anyone on the defensive end and have lots of youth as well. They don't have a lot of forwards signed, but have some flexibility and enough young potential. Marc-Andre Fleury is also an affordable goalie at only 5 million a season and locked up for the next 6 years, and I'd take him over a good number of goalies paid more than him. The question with Pittsburgh will be, can they afford Jordan Staal, and can they sign suitable wingers to play with Crosby and Malkin.
2. Philadelphia: Philly has a lot of players locked up long term and though I do not agree with or like all of their signings, the quality of talent is extremely high. I don't agree with signing Mike Richards for 12 years and the injury risk is high, but currently he's worth more than the 5.75 million he's being paid so his negatives balance his positives. Players like Gagne and Jeff Carter are both playing well above the value of their contracts so they are both definite positives. It's debatable whether Briere, Timonen, Lupul, or Hartnell are worth what they getting paid, but Philly will have them all for at least 3 years, and so Philly's core is quite strong. Philly's big question is in goal where they currently don't have a goalie signed for next season.
3. Buffalo: The best thing about Buffalo are their forwards. They have top end forwards signed long term and they are all fairly young. They have 5 forwards signed longterm, 3 of which are first liners, 1 is a second liner, and 1 is a third liner. They also have 3 young talented RFA forwards who could complete their forwards for at least the next three years. Buffalo's defence is acceptable, but the key is they aren't overpaying for anyone. Craig Rivet is making the most and he's only at 3.5 million for the next two years. The real positive is that Ryan Miller is signed long term and that Buffalo will be able to rely on him to keep them in the playoff run for at least the next five years. Buffalo's biggest negative is simply the age of their defenseman, they have developed a lot of young forwards but also need to develop young defenseman to balance their team and their cap situation.
4. Washington: Having the only current 60 goal player in the league signed to a 13 year deal never hurts, and that's the biggest factor that puts Washington in 4th. Otherwise Washington's defensive core is fairly strong with Green, Poti, and presumably Karl Alzner fairly soon. That would be a pretty strong top 3 and would only cost 10 million against the cap. Washington doesn't have a forward besides Ovechkin locked up beyond 2 seasons and both Semin and Backstrom are only locked up for next year. Yet, both Semin and Backstrom are RFA' so as long as the Caps can sign them to affordable deals, the offense should be fairly strong for years to come as well. In goal, Jose Theodore is signed through next year but it still remains to be seen as to whether he is a stopgap or is the Caps long term solution.
5. Tampa Bay: Though they are struggling so far this year, they have a number of affordable contracts and two key players signed noticeably under market value (St. Louis, Lecavalier). Malone's contract is probably too long and overpriced, but as a whole they have a nice mix of young up-and-comers and affordable veterans. The perceived value of this team may decrease if players like Vrbata and Stamkos don't start to score as they were expected to. The real question will be can their defense core improve because Paul Ranger and Andrei Meszaros are pretty long on T-Bay's blueline.
6. Florida: One of the best things about the Panthers is that they have a large group of their young players locked up to long term deals. Horton, Weiss, and Olesz are all locked up for at least the next 4 seasons, and young forward prospects like Frolik and David Booth are both controlled for the next few seasons through their RFA status. On defence, Florida has 3 solid d-men locked up for at least two more seasons, but Jay Bouwmeester, the best of the bunch is an UFA after this season, so that could be a significant negative for them. The other significant concern is the lack of top end talent on Florida; they have a significant number of players locked up but they aren't necessarily top line material or top pair d-men besides Horton, and McCabe, and those both may be debatable. Yet, for the lack of top end players, they don't have many overwhelming or overpriced contracts, so it basically balances out.
7. New York Rangers: The Rangers have a good number of players signed long term and for those who aren't many will still be RFA's when there contract runs out. Next year is still a big question as Zherdev, Prucha, Korpikoski, Dubinsky, Dawes, Callahan, and Fritsche are all RFA's after this season. Consequently, the Rangers only have 5 forwards signed beyond this season, so the biggest question will be can New York afford to keep all those RFA's. I'm going to suggest they won't be able to because the Rangers already have 41 million counting against the cap without any of the RFA's signed. The defense has a top four that is fairly strong and all signed beyond through next season, and Girardi and Staal are both RFA's after next season so the Rangers still hold their rights for a while. In goal, the Rangers are amongst the best in the league with Henrik Lundqvist, and those he's making almost 7 million per season, he's locked up for the next 5 years and has been worth his salary so far. So, the biggest concern for the Rangers is whether they can afford to keep the players they have signed, and signing all of their RFA's,
8. Carolina: The Canes have to be one of few teams in professional sports to win a championship and then simply crumble. The most important thing for the Canes is that they have their franchise player signed long term, with Eric Staal being committed for 7 more years. Presuming that Staal is going to produce somewhere between the 80 to 100 points he has shown and not the 40 or 50 he is on pace for this, he’ll be a valuable player for years to come. Otherwise, Carolina looks not bad on paper with players like Williams, Pitkanen, and Brind’Amour signed for two more years. There are two factors that make Carolina a big question mark; first they seem to have a lot of injuries and often to their key players, and secondly, they have a good looking squad for next year but only Stall is signed for more than two more years. Finally, we have to wonder what is simply wrong with Carolina, they look like they should be good, but maybe they will always be a team that looks better on paper, and doesn’t simply have enough consistency to be a good team and make the playoffs every year.